{ 2007 06 30 }

Chatroom

So, 350 bucks bought me a ticket to watch six people seated in chairs yapping continuously for just over an hour. Sounds like my Monday morning progress meetings, only this bunch weren’t dressed as smartly and I didn’t get paid to be there. Superficially, the most value for money I got from the entire evening was a souvenir for twenty bucks which felt a damn site classier and better designed than stuff I’ve bought for fifty times as much, even though the writeup of Enda Walsh was ripped off from this page and it tries to convince me that someone actually wants credit for Set Design and Make Up. Frickin’ brilliant.

You might notice that I started the previous sentence with “superficially” because, quite frankly, this play isn’t about superficialities. Anyone who walked in there looking for classy costumes and flashy set-dressing would have walked out severely disappointed, unless their idea of flashy costumery is whatever the actors could find crumpled up under their beds come showtime. This play was about exposing the audience to six very different personalities while they interact and revolve around each other to the ultimate conclusion, which I’ll get to later on. It should be noted that lighting, audio or video were used sparingly and enhanced the performance considerably.

But first…

The Cast/Characters

Don’t know who they are and don’t care. All I care about is how they handled themselves on stage and in this respect they performed admirably. This was a cast of stereotypes, because that’s the only way this play works. You’ve got the stereotypical cynic (Will) who believes the world is out to get him, the angry teen aged girl (Eva) who feels betrayed by society, the timid, disillusioned conformist (Emily), the easy going nice guy (Jack) and the runt (Jim) who’s been picked on his entire life and feels trapped with no way out. They are familiar to us because we can relate to and understand their pain.

The parts were acted with impeccable timing and humour, and emotions were conveyed to the audience clearly and believably. One thing I did have a problem with was the actor playing Jim. While he was very convincing in his role as a depressive, possibly suicidal teen, he wasn’t convincing as a heterosexual depressive, possibly suicidal teen. This was mildly distracting and I believe that either the character should have been acted appropriately or changed to accommodate the actor. I should also point out, that I have nothing against heterosexuals and believe that they play a very important part in society.

The Synopsis

There’s a guy named Jim. He’s depressed. He’s had a horrible life and jumps from online chatroom to chatroom looking for an answer, a way out. There’s another bunch of people who are looking for a cause and Jim drops by and they adopt him as their pet project and try to figure out just how far they can take him towards offing himself. If you want a better explanation I’m sure you’ll find something in the quite enthusiastic, profuse and tiresome hype and praise that was floating around before and after each of this production’s incarnations.

The Issue

A theater production shouldn’t be lauded just because it deals with serious issues such as suicide. It doesn’t matter if it brings some attention to an issue that people should take more notice of, though it should be noted that this production is hardly targeted at the section of society that needs it the most. It’s a good thing that this particular play isn’t about suicide.

Even though Jim’s toying with the idea, Laura’s been through it (unsuccessfully, of course), and Will and Eva have taken it on themselves to push Jim over the edge this play is ultimately about the road to self-discovery and the obstacles people face along the way. Each character deals with this journey in their own way, or excludes themselves entirely, for their own reasons. William is too focussed on his cynical views on the world and looking outside himself for answers, or at the very least someone to blame. Eva is bitter over a perceived loss of innocence and is looking to get even. Emily is still clinging to her innocence and just wants to be accepted by everyone. Jack’s too content and doesn’t need to go looking for himself. Laura’s stood on the edge and returned, though she still feels it calling her back which is why she listens… partly to help others like herself, but mostly to remind herself where she’s been. And Jim… well he wants to be a cowboy and for people to tell him that it’s okay for him to be a cowboy. He wants to be himself.

To look at this work and label it as a play that deals with suicide is to simply not get it. Suicide is only the surface, It’s the metaphorical carrot used by the playright to make his characters show their true colors. Look beneath it and you find a whole lot more to digest.

The End…?

The ending was handled with a quaint awkwardness which, in this case, worked for the better. This was 70 minutes of solid theater followed by one of the most satisfying endings I’ve witnessed on stage. Now that it’s over I hope this theater group moves on to other, better things… because the hype’s got old, and also because after the second rerun they may be accused of turning into a One Trick Pony that’s resting on its laurels. This would be a shame considering the strength of this performance.

Posted by admin on Saturday, June 30th, 2007, at 5:00 pm, and filed under Review.

Follow any responses to this entry with the RSS 2.0 feed.

You can post a comment, or trackback from your site.