<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Chatroom</title>
	<atom:link href="http://colombocritic.com/2007/06/chatroom-spam/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://colombocritic.com/2007/06/30/chatroom-spam/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 20:00:48 +0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Pyramus and Thisbe by Centrestage Productions - A Review</title>
		<link>http://colombocritic.com/2007/06/30/chatroom-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-64</link>
		<dc:creator>Pyramus and Thisbe by Centrestage Productions - A Review</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 04:03:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.colombocritic.com/2007/06/30/chatroom-spam/#comment-64</guid>
		<description>[...] play has been performed. While I&#8217;m glad that I got a chance to experience it my comments for Chatroom apply here [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] play has been performed. While I&#8217;m glad that I got a chance to experience it my comments for Chatroom apply here [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sanju</title>
		<link>http://colombocritic.com/2007/06/30/chatroom-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-63</link>
		<dc:creator>sanju</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 09:36:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.colombocritic.com/2007/06/30/chatroom-spam/#comment-63</guid>
		<description>here ! please ignore this being vicious shit and continue reviewing. if something is bad it must be hammered and if its good it must be commended. the problem about lankan reviewers is that they all suck up and say wonderful wonderful to the rubbish that is perpetrated on us. i am sure they are paid to say good things.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>here ! please ignore this being vicious shit and continue reviewing. if something is bad it must be hammered and if its good it must be commended. the problem about lankan reviewers is that they all suck up and say wonderful wonderful to the rubbish that is perpetrated on us. i am sure they are paid to say good things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Colombo Critic</title>
		<link>http://colombocritic.com/2007/06/30/chatroom-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-55</link>
		<dc:creator>The Colombo Critic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 07:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.colombocritic.com/2007/06/30/chatroom-spam/#comment-55</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sorry, was I being vicious? Where exactly? I don&#039;t think I&#039;ve been vicious... yet.

Yes, the &quot;theater stalwarts&quot; labour against tremendous odds to stage their productions and they should be commended for that. But amateur or not financial transactions take place and it is reasonable to expect certain standards to be met.

And as I, like all the other patrons, paid the cost of admission then it is my right to comment on this production as I see fit. And as I also pay for this site then it is also my right to air my critique here and publicize it to the best of my abilities. If this does not please you then you are well within your rights to ask for a refund.

Oh, wait... I didn&#039;t ask you for any money did I?

I&#039;ve dealt with flak for my reviews before and it doesn&#039;t bother me. Apparently it is considered sacrilege to be less than fawning and I choose to be honest instead.

If you wish to write your own reviews then I will gladly publish them on this site. I&#039;m sure you would find that more productive than calling me long-winded and vicious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sorry, was I being vicious? Where exactly? I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;ve been vicious&#8230; yet.</p>
<p>Yes, the &#8220;theater stalwarts&#8221; labour against tremendous odds to stage their productions and they should be commended for that. But amateur or not financial transactions take place and it is reasonable to expect certain standards to be met.</p>
<p>And as I, like all the other patrons, paid the cost of admission then it is my right to comment on this production as I see fit. And as I also pay for this site then it is also my right to air my critique here and publicize it to the best of my abilities. If this does not please you then you are well within your rights to ask for a refund.</p>
<p>Oh, wait&#8230; I didn&#8217;t ask you for any money did I?</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve dealt with flak for my reviews before and it doesn&#8217;t bother me. Apparently it is considered sacrilege to be less than fawning and I choose to be honest instead.</p>
<p>If you wish to write your own reviews then I will gladly publish them on this site. I&#8217;m sure you would find that more productive than calling me long-winded and vicious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thekillromeoproject</title>
		<link>http://colombocritic.com/2007/06/30/chatroom-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-56</link>
		<dc:creator>thekillromeoproject</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 12:18:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.colombocritic.com/2007/06/30/chatroom-spam/#comment-56</guid>
		<description>While I do understand that your hope is to put a little more perspective on the subject, I have my doubts as to what your intentions are. Is it to encourage our theater stalwarts who labour against tremendous odds to stage these productions? Rather it seems to me that your long winded review seems to hide a certain vicious pleasure at pointing out the faults you have managed to pick up. I don&#039;t deny the value of honest criticism, but only if it&#039;s given in the true spirit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I do understand that your hope is to put a little more perspective on the subject, I have my doubts as to what your intentions are. Is it to encourage our theater stalwarts who labour against tremendous odds to stage these productions? Rather it seems to me that your long winded review seems to hide a certain vicious pleasure at pointing out the faults you have managed to pick up. I don&#8217;t deny the value of honest criticism, but only if it&#8217;s given in the true spirit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Colombo Critic</title>
		<link>http://colombocritic.com/2007/06/30/chatroom-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-60</link>
		<dc:creator>The Colombo Critic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2007 08:55:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.colombocritic.com/2007/06/30/chatroom-spam/#comment-60</guid>
		<description>Firstly, you may not have noticed that the first paragraph wasn&#039;t intended to be taken seriously.

As for Jim&#039;s sexual orientation... the dialogue implies that he is straight though not overtly enough that it can be taken as fact. The delivery confuses even further because the audience is unsure of whether the character is gay, just overly effeminate but straight or acted over-the-top for humorous effect. If the first then this is needlessly confusing, or if the latter then it is redundant as the play is funny enough without it. Effeminate would have been the ideal, but it didn&#039;t feel like this had been achieved satisfactorily.

Longing Adventure, your last paragraph could be interpreted as insulting by a lot of people, including myself. The price of this ticket was more than worth the experience, and it was still cheaper than a lot of other productions. Also, if only a few people like me were the only theater patrons, then there would be no theater in this country. That&#039;s not the way things work. What I hope to achieve is to hopefully put a little more perspective on the subject.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Firstly, you may not have noticed that the first paragraph wasn&#8217;t intended to be taken seriously.</p>
<p>As for Jim&#8217;s sexual orientation&#8230; the dialogue implies that he is straight though not overtly enough that it can be taken as fact. The delivery confuses even further because the audience is unsure of whether the character is gay, just overly effeminate but straight or acted over-the-top for humorous effect. If the first then this is needlessly confusing, or if the latter then it is redundant as the play is funny enough without it. Effeminate would have been the ideal, but it didn&#8217;t feel like this had been achieved satisfactorily.</p>
<p>Longing Adventure, your last paragraph could be interpreted as insulting by a lot of people, including myself. The price of this ticket was more than worth the experience, and it was still cheaper than a lot of other productions. Also, if only a few people like me were the only theater patrons, then there would be no theater in this country. That&#8217;s not the way things work. What I hope to achieve is to hopefully put a little more perspective on the subject.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Electra</title>
		<link>http://colombocritic.com/2007/06/30/chatroom-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-59</link>
		<dc:creator>Electra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2007 07:26:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.colombocritic.com/2007/06/30/chatroom-spam/#comment-59</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the review. And for coming.

Firstly, of course someone needs to be credited for makeup and set design. It is only professional. They are both crucial aspects of any theatrical production and require expertise. Designing the set and making the actors up are both jobs for people who are intimate not only with staging conditions but are also thoroughly familiar with the play and the characters at hand.

Secondly, what made you so certain that Jim IS a heterosexual teen?

longing adventure : Is 350 really that absurd?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the review. And for coming.</p>
<p>Firstly, of course someone needs to be credited for makeup and set design. It is only professional. They are both crucial aspects of any theatrical production and require expertise. Designing the set and making the actors up are both jobs for people who are intimate not only with staging conditions but are also thoroughly familiar with the play and the characters at hand.</p>
<p>Secondly, what made you so certain that Jim IS a heterosexual teen?</p>
<p>longing adventure : Is 350 really that absurd?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: longing adventure</title>
		<link>http://colombocritic.com/2007/06/30/chatroom-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-58</link>
		<dc:creator>longing adventure</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jul 2007 13:56:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.colombocritic.com/2007/06/30/chatroom-spam/#comment-58</guid>
		<description>i do have to say that i missed the production both times but it&#039;s fascinating to see that from the many many people i&#039;ve spoken to about this particular production i&#039;ve never heard anything quite like this.

wow you must really be into reviewing stuff cause you&#039;ve seen through all of the details. ten of my friends went over to watch it the last time round and said it was brilliant, but they were probably not qualified enough as an audience to comment.

seven more friends went to watch it this time around, two of whom had been to it the last time and they claimed it was better than the first run. idiots that they are.

i honestly believe we need more people like you who can read between the lines of every theatre production that happens in colombo, saves us the trouble of paying absurd amounts like 350 rupees to go watch it ourselves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i do have to say that i missed the production both times but it&#8217;s fascinating to see that from the many many people i&#8217;ve spoken to about this particular production i&#8217;ve never heard anything quite like this.</p>
<p>wow you must really be into reviewing stuff cause you&#8217;ve seen through all of the details. ten of my friends went over to watch it the last time round and said it was brilliant, but they were probably not qualified enough as an audience to comment.</p>
<p>seven more friends went to watch it this time around, two of whom had been to it the last time and they claimed it was better than the first run. idiots that they are.</p>
<p>i honestly believe we need more people like you who can read between the lines of every theatre production that happens in colombo, saves us the trouble of paying absurd amounts like 350 rupees to go watch it ourselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Colombo Critic</title>
		<link>http://colombocritic.com/2007/06/30/chatroom-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-57</link>
		<dc:creator>The Colombo Critic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jul 2007 08:49:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.colombocritic.com/2007/06/30/chatroom-spam/#comment-57</guid>
		<description>Yes, I&#039;m well aware how long you&#039;ve been around... just as you should be aware that a theater group is only as good as its last production.

I eagerly await the next one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I&#8217;m well aware how long you&#8217;ve been around&#8230; just as you should be aware that a theater group is only as good as its last production.</p>
<p>I eagerly await the next one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: daytripper</title>
		<link>http://colombocritic.com/2007/06/30/chatroom-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-61</link>
		<dc:creator>daytripper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jul 2007 02:56:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.colombocritic.com/2007/06/30/chatroom-spam/#comment-61</guid>
		<description>just a response to your &#039;one trick pony&#039; bit: mind adventures has been around since 1999 and we do a production every year. we&#039;ve got a category that lists most of our previous stuff.this one has been the most high profile only because we used the blog so much for publicity.

thanks so much for your review. it&#039;s good to know that someone is out there doing it, because there is such a lack of objective analysis. cheers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>just a response to your &#8216;one trick pony&#8217; bit: mind adventures has been around since 1999 and we do a production every year. we&#8217;ve got a category that lists most of our previous stuff.this one has been the most high profile only because we used the blog so much for publicity.</p>
<p>thanks so much for your review. it&#8217;s good to know that someone is out there doing it, because there is such a lack of objective analysis. cheers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: daytripper post script &#171;</title>
		<link>http://colombocritic.com/2007/06/30/chatroom-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-62</link>
		<dc:creator>daytripper post script &#171;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2007 16:00:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.colombocritic.com/2007/06/30/chatroom-spam/#comment-62</guid>
		<description>[...] here and here and here&#8217;s what people said this time around. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] here and here and here&#8217;s what people said this time around. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
